Facilities Management

Supreme Court backs student free speech rights in "cursing cheerleader" case

Justices say a Pennsylvania high school went too far when it kicked a student off the cheerleading squad after a vulgar social media post.
June 24, 2021
3 min read

The U.S. Supreme Court has ruled in favor of the free speech rights of students, siding with a high school student whose vulgar social media post got her kicked off a cheerleading squad.

The Associated Press reports that the court voted 8-1 in favor of Brandi Levy, who was a 14-year-old freshman at Mahanoy Area High School when she expressed her disappointment over not making the varsity cheerleading team with a string of curse words and a raised middle finger on Snapchat.

Levy, of Mahanoy City, Pa., was not at school when she made her post, but she was suspended from cheerleading activities for a year anyway. In an opinion by Justice Stephen Breyer, the high court ruled that the suspension violated Levy’s First Amendment freedom of speech rights. Justice Clarence Thomas dissented, noting he would have upheld the suspension.

The justices did not foreclose schools from disciplining students for what they say off campus, though they did not spell out when schools could act.

Despite ruling in Levy’s favor, Breyer wrote that “we do not believe the special characteristics that give schools additional license to regulate student speech always disappear when a school regulates speech that takes place off campus. The school’s regulatory interests remain significant in some off-campus circumstances.”

Both sides in the case found reason to be pleased with the Supreme Court decision.

Levy said she was gratified that the court felt the school's punishment was excessive.

“The school went too far, and I’m glad that the Supreme Court agrees,” Levy, now 18, said in an American Civil Liberties Union news release. “I was frustrated, I was 14 years old, and I expressed my frustration the way teenagers do today. Young people need to have the ability to express themselves without worrying about being punished when they get to school.

The Mahanoy Area School District said that it was "pleased with and vindicated by" the decision, which found that schools could regulate some off-campus student speech.

Legal experts said the decision was a strong endorsement of students’ right to speak freely, which the court first expressed more than a half century ago in defending armbands worn by high school students in protest of the Vietnam War.

The case arose from Levy’s posts, one of which pictured her and a friend with raised middle fingers and included the repeated use of a vulgarity to complain that she had been left off the varsity cheerleading squad.

Levy’s parents filed a federal lawsuit after the cheerleading coach learned of the posts and suspended her from the junior varsity team for a year. Lower courts ruled in Levy’s favor, and she was reinstated.

The school district appealed to the Supreme Court after the broad appellate ruling that said off-campus student speech was beyond schools’ authority to punish.

About the Author

Mike Kennedy

Senior Editor

Mike Kennedy, senior editor, has written for AS&U on a wide range of educational issues since 1999.

Sign up for American School & University Newsletters