Research

Making Gains: 5th Annual College Maintenance and Operations (M&O) Cost Study

As competition grows on the higher-education front, more institutions are improving their position by focusing on an aspect that typically is the first-and
April 1, 1999
6 min read

As competition grows on the higher-education front, more institutions are improving their position by focusing on an aspect that typically is the first-and often most remembered-impression prospective students and parents have as they search for a college: the physical environment.

According to American School & University's fifth annual College Maintenance and Operations (M&O) Cost Study, colleges are allocating more money and a larger percentage of their total budgets to improve the appearance and operations of facilities. Overall, colleges earmarked 10 percent of their total institution budgets to M&O for the 1998-99 school year (compared with 9.7 percent last year).

Survey methodology

To arrive at the results for this year's College M&O Cost Study, in-depth questionnaires were mailed to approximately 1,300 physical plant directors at 2-year colleges and 4-year institutions with no significant graduate programs. Respondents were asked to document expenditures for various M&O categories for the 1998-99 school year, including salaries, benefits, supplies, energy and equipment.

The survey specifically targets 2-year colleges and 4-year institutions with no significant graduate programs in order to provide useful comparative information. Larger 4-year colleges with significant graduate programs are not surveyed because their operations are so varied that results would be less useful.

Responding institution backgrounds vary. More than 93 percent of 2-year colleges responding to the survey are public, while 86 percent of 4-year colleges are private. This should be helpful when comparing your college's costs with those reported in the survey.

Facts and figures

Table 1 reviews M&O spending per full-time-equivalent (FTE) student, and includes breakdowns by 2-year, 4-year, and all colleges for such categories as salaries, benefits, energy, supplies, water/sewer, equipment, total M&O and equipment maintenance, and identifies the percentage of the total budget allocated to M&O by colleges.

Four-year colleges traditionally budget considerably more per student for M&O than their 2-year counterparts. For the 1998-99 school year, 4-year colleges allocated $1,559 per student while 2-year colleges spent $536. As described in previous surveys, the wide discrepancy in spending is most likely due to a number of factors, including the most obvious-4-year colleges differ significantly in their educational mission and offerings to students. In addition, 4-year colleges typically have more specialized buildings and courses; older physical plants; extensive laboratory and health facilities; housing; and 24-hour, year-round usage than 2-year colleges.

However, 2-year colleges continue to allocate a larger percentage of their total institution budgets to M&O than 4-year colleges. Two-year colleges allocate 10.5 percent of their total budgets to M&O while 4-year colleges dedicate 10 percent.

As can be expected, salaries and benefits represent the largest portion of M&O costs at both 2-year and 4-year colleges. Two-year colleges spend 54 percent of their M&O budgets on salaries and benefits, 4-year colleges 51 percent, and all institutions 52 percent.

Energy, including gas, electricity, oil and other sources, is the next most significant expenditure per student. Four-year colleges allocate a larger percentage of their budget (30 percent compared to 28 percent at 2-year institutions) to energy, and spend more than three times the amount ($465) per student than 2-year colleges ($152). The median college earmarks 26 percent of its M&O budget ($193 per student) to energy.

Supplies make up more than 10 percent of all colleges' M&O budgets per student, followed by equipment maintenance (5 percent), equipment (3 percent) and water/sewer (3 percent). While 4-year colleges spend more per student on supplies and water/sewer, 2-year colleges outspend them on equipment and equipment maintenance.

Additional data

Table 2 offers a breakdown of M&O expenditures per square feet of building maintained, which are more comparable between 2-year and 4-year colleges than per-student costs. For example, 2-year colleges spend $3.70 per square foot on M&O while 4-year colleges spend $3.41. The median college spends $3.62 per square foot.

M&O costs per square foot for 2-year and 4-year colleges are fairly close across most of the categories surveyed. However, 4-year colleges maintain more than four times the amount of building space per FTE student than 2-year colleges. Four-year institutions maintain 545 square feet per student; 2-year colleges maintain 132 square feet. The median college upkeeps 194 square feet per student.

Salary figures always are of interest to most readers. Table 3 lists the median salaries paid for a variety of M&O job functions at 2-year, 4-year and all colleges. Amongthe titles surveyed include:

-Administration: Those individuals who have managerial or supervisory duties (does not include the overall director of physical plant).

-Clerical: Those individuals who perform secretarial duties.

-Custodial: Those individuals responsible for building upkeep and cleaning.

-Engineer/Architect: Those in-house positions responsible for planning, design and specialized facilities duties.

-Grounds: Those individuals responsible for landscape maintenance and upkeep.

-Maintenance: Those individuals who perform skilled jobs, such as plumbing, electrical or HVAC repair.

-Motor Pool: Those individuals involved with transportation operations.

-Security: Those individuals responsible for safety of buildings and equipment. Does not include professional security or law-enforcement officials, if employed by the college.

When comparing salaries, please note that job functions such as security, engineer/architect and motor pool should only be factored in if they are part of your M&O budget.

Table 4 identifies the median number of full- and part-time M&O personnel by function at colleges, as well as the median number of M&O personnel per 100 FTE students. For the 1998-99 school year, the median 2-year college employed 43 M&O personnel; the median 4-year institution had 50; and the median college had 44 M&O personnel.

In addition, 4-year colleges employ significantly more M&O staff per 100 FTE students than 2-year colleges (4 compared to 1.61). The median college employs 2.72 M&O staff per 100 FTE students.

Under the microscope

Among additional data gleaned from the most recent College M&O Cost Study, the median responding institution:

-Has a 1998-99 school-year budget of $1.8 million for M&O.

-Maintains 80 total acres.

-Has a full-time enrollment of 1,625 (2,650 at 2-year colleges and 1,250 at 4-year institutions).

-Has 21 buildings on campus.

-Maintains 423,853 gross square feet (gsf) of buildings (2-year colleges maintain 412,975 gsf; 4-year colleges maintain 480,000 gsf).

Contracted services are prevalent on college campuses. Approximately 47 percent of institutions (50 percent of 4-year colleges and 44 percent of 2-year colleges) report turning over M&O to outside firms.

A majority of colleges expect to make major M&O equipment purchases this school year. Approximately 77 percent of all colleges will purchase such items as automobiles, cleaning equipment and grounds machinery. By institution type, 73 percent of 2-year colleges and 81 percent of 4-year colleges will be procuring major equipment.

About the Author

Joe Agron

Editor-in-Chief and Associate Publisher

Joe Agron is the editor-in-chief/associate publisher of American School & University magazine. Joe has overseen AS&U's editorial direction for more than 25 years, and has helped influence and shape national school infrastructure issues. He has been sought out for comments by publications such as The Wall Street Journal, The New York Times, USA Today, U.S. News & World Report, ABC News and CNN, and assisted with the introduction of the Education Infrastructure Act of 1994.

Joe also authors a number of industry-exclusive reports. His "Facilities Impact on Learning" series of special reports won national acclaim and helped bring the poor condition of the nation's schools to the attention of many in the U.S. Congress, U.S. Department of Education and the White House.

Sign up for American School & University Newsletters